1. Download Roman Irani 98ia

Contents. Characteristics The Romans, having expanded into the eastern Mediterranean, came in contact with their historical rivals in the: the Parthians and Persians, whose respective empires occupied modern and surrounding areas.

The history of Iran. With the conclusion of the over 700 years lasting Roman–Persian Wars through the climactic Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628. ⓃⓐⓩⓘShoma hamaro goftin digeh😀roman gonahkar va talayieh ghashan. Ftm: سلام لطفا لگه میشه جلد دومشو بزارید.

The empires that faced the Romans had different names, related to the origin of the dynasties in control of their empires in different historical periods: first were the (Media Atropatene), then and finally. In 64 BC conquered the remaining Seleucid territories in, extinguishing their state and advancing the Roman eastern frontier to the, where Romans met for the first time the territory of the Parthians., in his quest to avenge the defeat, conquered in 33 BC some areas of (northern Iran) and Armenia but soon lost it: that was the first time that Romans occupied a Persian territory, even if temporarily. Map showing Media Atropatene inside the Roman Empire, as part of Assyria province Furthermore, probably in 20 BC, is said to have nominated, the son of Artavasdes, to be king of, creating a semi-authonomous 'vassal state' of Rome in what is now northwestern Iran. But soon, around 19 AD, The Parthians took again full control of Atropatene. Although warfare between the Romans and the Parthians/Sassanids lasted for seven centuries, the frontier remained largely stable in those centuries.

A game of ensued: towns, fortifications, and provinces were continuously sacked, captured, destroyed, and traded. The line of stalemate shifted in the 2nd century AD with: it had run along the northern until then. The new line ran northeast, across Mesopotamia to the northern. There were also several substantial shifts further north, in and the. A new series of wars began in the 2nd century AD, during which the Romans consistently held the upper hand over Parthia. In 113 AD the Roman Emperor decided that the moment was ripe to resolve the 'eastern question' once and for all time by the decisive defeat of Parthia and the annexation of Armenia: his conquests mark a deliberate change of the Roman Policy towards Parthia, and a shift of emphasis in the ' of the empire.

Finally, one characteristic of the Roman presence in Persia is that Roman emperors dreamed of conquering all Persia from Trajan to Galerius, while Parthian/Sassanian kings never tried to conquer Rome, Italy or southeastern Europe according to historian. Roman Parthia Romans were able to conquer a great part of Parthia under emperor Trajan. Indeed, in 113 AD Trajan invaded, marching first on. In 114 AD Trajan annexed Armenia to the Roman empire, after defeating and killing, relative of of Parthia. Then he turned south into Parthia itself, taking the cities of, and finally the capital of in 116 AD. He deposed Osroes I and put his own puppet ruler on the throne.

In Osroes' brother and his son took the diadem and fought against the Romans, but Trajan marched southward to the Persian Gulf, defeated them, and declared a new province of the empire. Later in 116 AD, he crossed the mountains into and captured the great city of. Those months of 116 and 117 saw western Parthia as a of the Romans. Trajan originally planned to annex Parthia as part of the, but ultimately decided instead to place Parthamaspates on his father's throne as a Roman client, doing so in 116. Trajan then proceeded into Mesopotamia with eleven Legions, taking the city of Nisibis and Batnae in September 115 AD. For these early victories, he was granted the title Parthicus by the Senate, which he was hesitant to accept. Continuing his march, Trajan crossed the Tigris River using boats and reached the city of Babylon, before returning to Antioch to pass the winter.

In the following year, Trajan returned to Mesopotamia to continue his conquest. He crossed the Tigris, reaffirmed his conquest of Adiabene and proceeded to Ctesiphon, the most important capital of the Parthian Empire. The Parthian King fled and the city fell without much of a siege. At that point, Trajan formally incorporated the title Parthicus into his name to his victory, along with the phrase Parthia Capta (Parthia seized) on his coins. During all of this campaign, he had been largely unopposed on the field by the Parthians, who had been severely weakened in a civil war that was still ongoing during Trajan’s campaign.

No major pitched battles were recorded and it appears that most of the campaign had consisted of sieges. Trajan himself was disappointed, for he had not won a great victory on the field against the “King of Kings”, as Alexander the Great had centuries before him. Upon reaching the Persian Gulf, it is said that he lamented as he saw a ship leaving for India, where he could not bring his conquest to.In southern Mesopotamia, Trajan learned that the cities he conquered in the north were revolting. He then dispatched his generals who recaptured the region.

Nisibis was recaptured and Edessa was sacked. Then, Trajan received word that a Parthian general Parthamastaphes, nephew of the King, was arriving with an army.

Interestingly, no battle was fought. Instead, Trajan placed Parthamastaphes on the throne of Ctesiphon as puppet Trajan’s puppet king. However, Trajan’s campaign turned for the worse. Armenia revolted from Roman rule and Trajan was forced to concede much of his Armenian conquests. In Mesopotamia, the city of Hatra resisted Trajan’s siege. Unable to take the city and short of supplies and campaign resources, Trajan’s campaign came to a close.

The emperor withdrew his men from southern Mesopotamia to consolidate his gains in the north. Trajan planned to embark on another campaign, but was struck by illness. Trajan died in 117 AD, after returning home. Trajan created even the province of, whose eastern border were never well defined by historians: it is possible that included northwestern, a semi-autonomous Persian province (now of Iran) that welcomed his conquest of Mesopotamia. Following the death of Trajan and Roman withdrawal from the area, Osroes easily defeated Parthamaspates and reclaimed the Persian throne.

Download Roman Irani 98ia

Acknowledged this fait accompli, recognized Osroes, Parthamaspates king of, and returned Osroes' daughter who had been taken prisoner by Trajan (as a warranty to control his client state). Even if there were further attacks from Roman emperors against the Parthian and later Sassanid empire (Romans even suffered humiliating defeats, like with emperor ), no huge territory of actual Iran was never occupied again by Roman legions: The Romans stopped always after conquering and soon returned behind their ' (only in 298 AD western Atropene up to lake Urmia was occupied by Romans for half a century). Indeed, this city (capital of the Parthian and Sassanian empire, but not located in Iran) was captured by Rome five times in its history - three times in the 2nd century alone.

Technical support. This section of the. If you attempt to install and run Red Alert on XP. Download and install the 1.08 update patch. & Patch 1.08 Developer Westwood Studios Game(s) Red Alert Counterstrike Release date 17 July. Red alert xp patch. This patch includes balance changes, improved multiplayer, and more. Read the readme for details. C&C returns with a world in which the Soviets, the Allies, and. The 1.08 English language patch for Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3. These section houses the latest official patches for C&C: Red Alert from Westwood. To use these files: Click on the filename of the file you want and choose a place.

The emperor Trajan captured Ctesiphon in 116 AD, but his successor, Hadrian, decided to willingly return Ctesiphon the next year as part of a peace settlement. The Roman general captured Ctesiphon in 164 AD during another Parthian war, but abandoned it when peace was concluded. In 197 AD, the emperor sacked Ctesiphon and carried off thousands of its inhabitants, whom he sold into slavery.

Late in the 3rd century, after the Parthians had been supplanted by the Sassanids, the city again became a source of conflict with Rome. In 283 AD, emperor sacked the city uncontested during a period of civil upheaval. In 295 AD, emperor sent but was defeated outside the city. However, he returned a year later with a vengeance and won a victory which ended in the fifth and final capture of the city by the Romans in 299 AD. Map showing the Roman conquests in western Persia up to, in the first decades of the 4th century (light pink).

Furthermore, in 297 AD Galerius marched into eastern Armenia and crushed there a Persian force, capturing an enormous amount of booty and even the harem and family of the Sassanian King. Moving later into Mesopotamia, Galerius' advance had the Persian defence collapsing before him and so he conquered the Persian capital Ctesiphon. Badly mauled, the Persians sued for peace. In AD 298 the province of Mesopotamia, together with even some territory from across the river up to the lacus Matianus (now called in western Iran), was restored to Rome for half a century with an important Treaty.

According to this:. Five provinces beyond the Tigris were to be ceded to the Romans. One writer gives these provinces as Intilene, Sophene, Arzanene, Carduene, and Zabdicene; while another as Arzanene, Moxoene, Zabdicene, Rehimene, and Corduene. The Roman vassal 'Kingdom of Armenia' was to be extended up to the fortress of, in Media Atropatene. The extension of Armenia to the fortress of Zintha, in Media, seems to have imported much more than would at first sight appear from the words. Gibbon interprets it as implying the cession of all Media Atropatene, which certainly appears a little later to be in the possession of the Armenian monarch, Tiridates.

A large addition to the Armenian territory out of the Median is doubtless intended; but it is quite impossible to determine definitely the extent or exact character of the cession. Galerius (who occupied western Persia up to lake Matianus) wanted to conquest all Persia after his victory against Sassanian king Narseh, but Diocletianus preferred to have a Treaty and did the last ' in with a significant victory in the history of the Roman Empire. Romans withdrew from the homeland territory of Persia with the 363 AD defeat of, and only Byzantine emperor was able to return and conquer (the capital of Atropatene) and (in central Persia) in 623 AD through the, just a few years before the Arab conquest of Sassanian Persia.

Valerian Bridge. Or Bridge of Caesar There are few Roman ruins in Persia, but one seems to be related to curious war events: the. This Valerian Bridge ( Band-e Kaisar in Persian, literally 'bridge of Caesar') is named after the Roman emperor (253–260 AD) who was captured with many legionaries by the Sassanid ruler after having been defeated in the (260). This vast labour force, which may have numbered up to 50,000 men and included the Roman engineering corps, was probably employed by the victors for construction work in, an important agricultural center in south-western Iran.

To service its large stretches of arable land, altogether some 150,000, the Romans set out to construct three structures: a canal called Ab-i Gargar, and the two dams of Band-e Kaisar and Band-e Mizan which directed the water flow of the Karun river into the artificial watercourse. Perhaps the bridge was built by soldiers of the, because this unit disappears from sources after Valerian's defeat.

The story of the Valerian Bridge was written by the Muslim historians and in the 9th and 10th centuries. Although their novel-like narrative cannot be ignored, the historical presence of the Romans is corroborated by modern local names, such as ' for a nearby village, and a tribe by the name of '. Moreover, local tradition ascribes to Roman settlers the origin of a number of trades, like the local production of, and several popular customs. The bridge has been designated by as Iran's 10th in 2009.

See also. Notes.